Part XX, article 368 of the Constitution deals with the Amendment of the Constitution. A "Bare
Act" represents the law as it is, without any simplification, explanatory footnoting, or
interpretation. Clauses are denoted as (368(a), 368(1)), and capital letters (e.g., 368A) generally
signify an Article added by an amendment.
Fundamental Rules of Amendment:
The power of amending resides with the Union (Parliament) ONLY.
State Legislatures cannot initiate amendments (they only have a limited role in ratifying when
the federal structure is involved).
Both Houses (Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha) can introduce amendment bills.
Can be introduced by Ministers or Private Members (non-ministers, from ruling or opposition
parties).
No prior permission from the President is required to introduce a
Constitutional Amendment Bill under Article 368.
Note: Any variation, addition, or
repeal—even adding a comma or deleting a dot—constitutes an amendment.
Journey of a Constitutional Amendment Bill
The procedure for passing an amendment is strictly defined. An amendment to the constitution does not
necessarily have to be done under Article 368; minor amendments can be done outside its scope (e.g.,
Article 3 and 4, Reorganization of States).
Key procedural steps under Article 368:
The bill is tabled on the floor by MPs in either the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha.
The bill has to be passed by both houses SEPARATELY.
There is NO JOINT SITTING of houses, even in the case of a deadlock.
Once passed by both houses, it is presented to the President.
The President has NO choice but to assent ("YES") to the bill
(Corrected fact: Established by the 24th Amendment Act, 1971, amending Article 368(2)).
Nature and Types of Amendments
There are two primary methods to amend or change the interpretation of the Constitution: Informal and
Formal.
Informal Methods
New Conventions: When new practices are established (e.g., the judiciary ruling
that walking on footpaths forms part of Article 21 - Right to Life & Liberty).
Judicial Interpretation: When the Supreme Court (the ultimate interpreter)
changes its stance. Article 137 enables the SC to review its own decisions, and Article 141
makes its judgments binding on all courts in India.
Formal Methods are categorized into Flexible and Rigid approaches:
Flexible: Procedures that are of a temporary nature and can be easily altered.
(e.g., 104th Amendment Act extended political reservations for another 10 years).
Rigid: Provisions central to the Constitution's core philosophy. The Constituent
Assembly made these rigid to preserve the spirit of the document, primarily governed by Article 368.
Categorisation of Formal Amendments
Simple Majority (Outside Article 368)
Special Majority (Article 368)
Special Majority + State Consent (Article 368)
Majority of the members present & voting ( > 50%). Similar to the ordinary legislative
process.
Majority of Total Membership of the House PLUS a majority of 2/3rd of
members present & voting.
Special Majority in Parliament PLUS ratification by simple majority of at
least 1/2 of the State Legislatures.
Used for less critical, structural changes like state reorganization or procedural rules.
Used for highly important constitutional aspects like Fundamental Rights.
Used exclusively for provisions affecting the Federal Structure of the country.
1. Simple Majority (Outside Scope of Article 368)
Admission, establishment, or formation of new states, and alteration of areas/boundaries/names.
Abolition or creation of State Legislative Councils (Article 169).
2nd Schedule: Emoluments, allowances, and privileges of the President, Governors, Speakers,
Judges, etc.
Quorum in Parliament (Minimum 10% needed to start a session).
Salaries and allowances of MPs, Rules of Procedure, Privileges of Parliament/Members/Committees.
Use of English/Official languages in Parliament.
Citizenship: Acquisition and termination.
Elections to Parliament and State Legislatures, delimitation of constituencies.
Number of Puisne Judges in the SC and modifying the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
Union Territories, 5th Schedule, and 6th Schedule administration.
2. Special Majority (Under Article 368)
This includes provisions regarding Fundamental Rights (Part III),
Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV), and all other
provisions not covered by the Simple Majority or Federal categories.
3. Special Majority + Consent of States (Under Article 368)
Election of the President and its manner.
Extent of executive power of the Union and the States.
Supreme Court and High Courts.
Distribution of legislative powers between Union and States.
Any of the lists in the 7th Schedule.
Representation of States in Parliament.
GST Council.
The power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and its procedure (Article 368 itself).
Nature of the Amendment Process
The Indian Constitution utilizes both formal and informal methods to adapt to changing times.
Informal Methods: Changes occur without altering the written text.
This
happens through the establishment of new conventions or when the Judiciary changes its
interpretation of a law. The Supreme Court is the ultimate
interpreter, utilizing its power of judicial review (Article 137)
to review its own decisions,
making its judgments binding on all courts in India (Article 141).
For example, expanding the interpretation of Article 21
(Right to Life and Liberty)
to include livelihood/shelter on footpaths.
Formal Methods: Direct alteration of the text, balancing Flexibility and Rigidity. Some
temporary provisions are flexible (e.g., the 104th Amendment extending
SC/ST reservations for 10 years), while core features preserving the Constitution's spirit remain
rigidly protected via Article 368.
Analytical View on Amendments
QWhy are there so many amendments to the Indian
Constitution? (106 Amendments in 77 years)
India has passed over 106 amendments in less than 80 years,
contrasting sharply with the
US Constitution, which has seen only 27 amendments in over 200 years due to its extreme rigidity
(requiring 3/4ths state ratification). The primary drivers for
India's frequent amendments are:
1. Rigidity vs. Flexibility: India blends both. A purely rigid constitution like
the USA has only seen 27 amendments in over 200 years because it requires 3/4th state ratification.
India's simple majority option inflates the number.
2. Implementation of a Welfare State: Transitioning to a socialist-leaning welfare
state required economic intervention via constitutional amendments (e.g., 1st Amendment adding the
9th Schedule, 103rd Amendment for EWS quotas). Capitalist countries like the USA do not require
these interventions.
3. Federal Re-Adjustment: India's political map has constantly evolved since 1947
to accommodate linguistic and economic demands. (e.g., 7th Amendment Act for states on linguistic
lines, 36th Amendment integrating Sikkim, 101st Amendment for GST).
4. Judicial-Legislative Tussles: Parliament frequently enacted amendments to
nullify Supreme Court judgments. (e.g., the 24th Amendment Act to nullify the Golaknath case; the
42nd Amendment Act attempted to strip the Judiciary of its review power).
QIs Constitutional Amendment Necessary?
YES. Amendments are critical to:
Make the Constitution relevant to changing realities and contemporary conditions.
Align with the changing needs and aspirations of society.
Ensure synchronization between the constitutional setup and evolving government policies.
Meet unforeseen exigencies, such as economic or political emergencies.
Ensure Social Justice as enshrined in the Preamble (e.g., the 42nd Amendment added
"Socialist", "Secular", and "Integrity", strengthening Directive Principles).
QWhat are the challenges related to frequent
amendments?
Erosion of Credibility: Frequent changes reduce public trust and stability,
making the constitution appear subject to temporary political interests (e.g., the 42nd
Amendment made extensive partisan changes).
Institutional Instability: Constant amendments change the function and
power of constitutional institutions, creating uncertainty.
Conflicts Among Constitutional Organs: Altering powers can lead to friction
between the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary (e.g., the 42nd Act limited judicial
review, sparking conflict).
Fragmentation of Constitutional Philosophy: Excessive amendments may weaken
original ideals and threaten the Basic Structure. (e.g., Corrected Fact: The 39th
Amendment Act, 1975 attempted to place the PM's election beyond judicial review. It was
challenged in the Indira Nehru Gandhi vs. Raj Narain case because it threatened the basic
structure).
Strained Relations: Causes tension between the Judiciary and Executive,
affecting judicial independence (e.g., the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2014,
establishing the NJAC, was struck down by the SC).
Concept Spotlight: Federalism
What is Federalism?
Local self-government is best explained as decentralization. Federalism is derived
from the Latin word 'Foedus', which means an agreement.
It is a form of government in which sovereign authority and political power are constitutionally
divided between the Center and the States.
Each entity is independent in controlling its own respective spheres.
A federation combines National and Local governments under a common sovereignty, with powers
strictly assigned to them by the Constitution.
Note: Global Comparison - Australia
follows a similar amendment procedure to India but also requires a public referendum.